New tax on electronics won't help recycling
Author:
Kevin Gaudet
2008/05/19
The Dalton McGuinty government has been trying to sneak through another new tax under the noses of unsuspecting Ontario consumers.
It ordered Waste Diversion Ontario to create a plan to deal with electronics waste starting with computers, printers, monitors and fax machines.
The plan creates a new, unelected and unaccountable organization -- Ontario Electronic Stewardship -- to set the new tax rates to be imposed on manufacturers and assemblers.
When the companies mark up the tax and pass it along to their customers starting early in 2009, consumers will be on the hook for over $104 million in new costs for a tax that will do little to increase recycling.
Recycling is a great idea, but this tax proposal is wrong-headed for many reasons.
First, it won't work because it provides no incentives to recycle, such as successful rebate programs used for liquor bottle returns.
It is a hidden and unaccountable tax. It will increase consumer costs. It will destroy a growing industry.
Fortunately, there is a far less costly and more sensible alternative, namely a deposit-return program.
Most recycling programs provide a deposit-return rebate at the end of use.
Thus, one has an incentive to bring back empty bottles because one will get back a few bucks.
A program like that would be both sensible and supportable, but this program does not do that.
It charges a recycling fee at the front end but provides no incentive at the back end to return electronic items by returning the recycling fee to the customer.
BUREAUCRATIC FASHION
Instead, in true bureaucratic fashion, the government expects brochures and other advertising to create that incentive.
Imagine what the sides of our roadways would look like if we applied the same policy to beer cans!
Ontarians may be unaware of it, but there already exists a thriving recycling and reuse industry in Ontario, with a capacity of 170,000 tonnes per year, almost double the required program capacity of 90,000 tonnes per year.
With that much existing excess capacity, a government-run program is not only redundant, but threatens the viability of a successful, taxpaying industry.
The Ontario government's proposal amounts to nothing more than a new tax on electronic items.
Phase 1, alone, of this new tax will drain between $104 and $209 million a year out of the pockets of consumers in Ontario; $62 million going to government and the rest to electronics companies.
To avoid the tax, many consumers will make their purchases out of province, hurting Ontario businesses even more than they are already hurting.
Ontario consumers should be aware there are three more phases of new taxes to follow, as well!
These new consumer costs will not address the growth of phase 1 costs, nor the economic impacts of phases 2, 3, and 4, which will encompass copiers, personal digital assistants (PDAs), scanners, telephones, cell phones and all other audio equipment including stereos, speakers, MP3 players, IPods and DVD players. These new tax rates have not yet been established.
While campaigning a year ago in advance of the last fall's provincial election McGuinty promised not to raise the taxes of Ontarions.
Phase 1 of the WEEE Program Plan alone breaks that promise with the imposition of a new tax on electronics under the guise of a recycling program.
NO SURPRISE
Given McGuinty's track record of breaking tax promises, Ontarians shouldn't be too surprised.
With this program the Ontario government is stepping in the way of natural progress on the reduction of electronic waste in landfills.
Without a rebate program and by hiding taxes, this effort will do little to help the environment but much to increase the genuine perception that environmental protection amounts to little more than tax grabs and increased costs for the public.